There is a great article over at Businessweek
titled “Software as a Service Myths.” (Thanks to Yves Lermusiaux at Taleo for
pointing the article out .)
We have launched a new Central Sourcing Business (if something is strategic it is a business, not a function – see Draw the Lines),
and we are using Salesforce.com as our technology platform of choice. We have
developed a “central platform / local service” approach that extends
leading-edge sourcing management capabilities to all of our studio sourcers while
ensuring that they can maintain local control, support and configuration
management.
We looked at a couple of vendors to build this new
integrated application set on, and it was a tight race between Microsoft CRM
3.0 and Salesforce, but in the end Salesforce won the initial deal because I
didn’t want to have to deal with installing and managing a platform. I sold some of the first ASP solutions in 1996 and I have been a fan
of that approach ever since. Now ASP has morphed into SaaS (Software as a
Service), but the concept is essentially the same: if you don’t make money by
supporting software, give the business to someone who does. EA does not make
money by hosting front- or back-office applications, so I wanted to work with
someone who does. Salesforce did, Microsoft didn’t.
salesforce is great!
ms crm 3.0 is great!
live is great!
technology is great!
PEOPLE are MORE then great *wink*
~jer
www.o0.typepad.com
Posted by: Jeremy Langhans | April 19, 2006 at 05:32 PM